Added: Jan 31, 2010
From: igorfrankenstein2
Duration: 10:1
RUSSIAN TEAM OF SCIENTISTS EXPLORES ICA STONES IN PERU, STONES THAT USED TO BE A PART OF A VISUAL LIBRARY FOR THE GENERAL FLORA AND FAUNA EDUCATION OF THE PRE-DILUVIAN TIME. Instead of having this antediluvian information on paper, wood or papyrus as a media carrier, information was carried (written) on stones. We see on Ica stones the same generic principals of the data storage and classification of information as we have today, except that media carrier [for data information] in Ica stones case is stone. NOTE 1: THIS FOOTAGE IS NOT A PROPAGATION OF CREATIONISM OR EVOLUTIONISM, SINCE BOTH ARE ARTIFICIALLY CREATED IDEOLOGIES. THE REASON BEHIND CREATION OF THESE IDEOLOGIES IS PRETTY SIMPLE: TO CONTROL HUMAN & ANALYTICAL DEVELOPMENT. FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUCH CONTROL THE STORY OF CREATION WAS INVENTED (TORAH, BIBLE, QURAN) WITH ANOTHER ONE DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSITE LATER - THE THEORY-IDEOLOGY OF EVOLUTION (SAPIENS FROM APE). NOTE 2: Torah and Bible account about "creation of Adapa" is partially true, but it does not relate to all of humanity and much more sinister that one can imagine. THUS THE NEURO-ALGORITHM BEHIND TWO OPPOSITE IDEOLOGIES IS SIMPLE: TO CONVINCE AN ACCEPTANCE OF THE SECOND DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSITE IDEOLOGY IF HUMAN HAS DOUBTS IN FIRST. EACH INDIVIDUAL HAS TWO CHOISES - TO BELIEVE IN BRAINWASH OF CREATION IDEOLOGY OR TO FALL INTO BRAINWASHING TENETS OF THE SCIENCE OF EVOLUTION. AS MECHANISM OF THE EXECUTION OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION THE FIST BLACK EVE IN AFRICA WAS INVENTED - TO MATCH THE FIRST EVE IN GENESIS TEXTS. I am not proponent of both ideologies. In addition I reject the ideology behind Sumerian Story of Creation that humanity was created by Anunnaki-Saurians. It is all specifically targeted disinformation for the human mind which is in quest for the truth. All stories on Sumerian-Babylonian clay tablets and consequently in Torah and Bible are PARTIALLY true, but dont relate to the whole humanity. As Vedic texts state part of humanity was born from gods (ancestral Genotheism) and part was created by gods (Genesis - Sumerian, Torahic & Bible story) . - THE HISTORY OF THE ICA SITE: Known collectively as the Ica Stones (they are found in Ica, Peru), these rocks, varying in size from that of a baseball to twice that of a basketball, are hand-etched with pictures of primitive fish, DINOSAURS, HUMANS WITH DINOSAURS using what appear to be tools of advanced technology. Pictures are intriguing, and they have delighted tourists and mystified researchers for decades. The Ica Stones first came to the attention of the scientific community in 1966 when Dr. Javier Cabrera, a local physician, received a small, carved rock for his birthday from a poor native. The carving on the rock looked ancient to Dr. Cabrera, but intrigued him because it seemed to depict a primitive fish. Hearing that the doctor was interested in the stone, local natives began to bring him more, which they collected from a river bank (not far from the famous Nazca lines). This soon developed into a vast collection of more than 15,000 stones, many etched with impossible scenes. Whereas it might be difficult to prove that the fish represented a long-extinct species, as Dr. Cabrera thought, other scenes carved on other stones are not so ambiguous. They clearly depict such dinosaurs as triceratops, stegosaurus, Apatosaurus and HUMAN FIGURES RIDING ON THE BACKS OF DINOSAURS AND FLYING PTERODACTYLS. WHATS MORE, SOME OF THE SCENES ARE OF MEN HUNTING AND KILLING DINOSAURS. Others show men watching the heavens through what look like telescopes, performing open-heart surgery and cesarean section births. The stones themselves are composed of andesite, a very hard mineral that would make etching quite difficult with primitive tools. They are covered with a natural varnish that is created by bacteria over thousands of years. The etching is made by scraping away this dark varnish to reveal the lighter mineral beneath. According to reports, examinations of the stones show that the grooves of the etchings are very old. NOTE 3: So, how old is a human if he was living with dinosaurs? Slavic and Hindu Vedas state that human race is 1.5 billion years old, with the same appearance exactly as we are today. NOTE 4: Some dates of human existence are recorded in Slavic-Aryan Vedas up to the year 604,383 BC called The Time of Three Suns. This Slavic preserved calendar (as also Hindu Vedic calendar) dismantles the whole modern Ape-Eve out of Africa evolution theory- ideology, Sumerian-Babylonian creation theory [of humankind] by Anunnaki and Torah-Bible erroneous Adapa genesis story. So why Ica stones story of human coexistence with dinosaurs is not acceptable?
Channel: Education
Tags: humans coexisted with dinosaurs antediluvian civilization ica stones peru nazca bolivia mesoamerica javier cabrera daarya haarya asgard slavic hindu vedas sanskrit pterodactyls triceratops stegosaurus apatosaurus anunnaki sumer assyria babylon clay tablets egypt aryan torah bible genesis epic of gilgamesh creation story enuma elish
Rating: 4.0' max='5' min='1' numRaters='4' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#overall ( ratings) Views: 163 Comments: 7
igorfrankenstein2 Says:
Jan 31, 2010 - ...no, its Ica, in Peru, not Inca.
lawilson200 Says:
Jan 31, 2010 - Yet another YEC who does not know the first thing about standards. Like the Pauluxy Footprints and Amerllo Figurines, Ica Stones are proven fakes. Yet, so desperate I sometimes find YECs, they are willing to ignore factual investigations, if only because it propagates their bad theology. This is why we laugh at you!
igorfrankenstein2 Says:
Jan 31, 2010 - ...remember, ignorance is curable, but arrogance is not.....in regards to Ica stones, Russians did their own investigation (including radiometric and spectral analysis') on taken true Ica samples (not modern fakes) to Moscow's Academy of Science lab AND TESTING CONTRADICTS the "factual C14 investigations" you are referring to... The whole idea of investigating Ica stones was brought by lately discovered 45 meters tall pyramids in Crimea, Ukraine where Inside were found not hatched dinosaur eggs
lawilson200 Says:
Feb 1, 2010 - After reviewing my initial entry, I fail to find any reference made to radiocarbon dating. And besides which, your response is patently absurd. In the 1960's the Pervian Police investigated the so-called Ica Stones (because selling antiquities is illegal in Peru). During the course of their investigation, they obtained confessions from the villagers responsible for carving the stones. They admitted to using photographs obtained from popular magazines to carve the stones.
igorfrankenstein2 Says:
Feb 1, 2010 - Weak argument, you know and I know that Ica stones divided on real ones and modern fakes that people "created" for Cabrera just to make some money. I was present during test on original Ica stone with 1 mm relief cutting - its real. So, don't fool yourself and others. Secondly, you did not mention C14 dating in your comment but you were reffering to the "FACT" as evidence of "INVESTIGATION" and that "investigation" was C14 dating. Fools did not get it that C14 is useless on non-organic matter.
lawilson200 Says:
Feb 1, 2010 - And that is part of the problem, Cabrera never reveled the actual location where he allegedly found the stones, making an independent investigation nearly impossible, And just how do you date a rock using C14? The rock used for the so-called stones are composed of andesite. You cannot date volcanic rock using carbon dating methods, because their is no carbon in the rock! And carbon dating methods is pointless unless Cabrera reveled his source, which he never did.

2014andBeyonD Says:
Jan 31, 2010 - Ica or Inca?